Arjab Jena@ Arjab Kumar Jena Vs. Utsa Jena @ Pattnaik (Supreme Court of India) We disapprove the observations made in the impugned order which refer to the comments made during the course of the mediation or settlement proceedings. The High Court should not have taken the aforesaid comments on record, as the same would impede […]
In addition to nominated agencies as notified by RBI (in case of banks) and nominated agencies notified by DGFT, qualified jewellers as notified by International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) will be permitted to import gold under specific ITC(HS) Codes through India International Bullion Exchange IFSC Ltd. (IIBX). However, Import of gold/silver under Advance Authorisation […]
Manish Scrap Traders Vs Principal Commissioner (Gujarat High Court) Way back in the year 2016, in the case of Kaneria Granito Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Civil Application No.14497 of 2014 decided on 27.06.2016, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court took the view that a cash credit account cannot be provisionally attached. […]
It is hereby directed that the SWIFT operations shall be undertaken from the IBU, GIFT City, Gandhinagar by assigning the roles of maker and checker to suitable staff in IBU itself for ensuring the data confidentiality and data protection.
Airtel Payments Bank Limited has been included in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 vide Notification DoR.LIC.No.S2659/16.13.215/2021-22 dated December 02, 2021 and published in the Gazette of India (Part III – Section 4) dated January 01 – January 07, 2022.
To promote retail participation in Government Securities by providing prices/quotes to Retail Direct Gilt (RDG) account holders enabling them to buy/sell securities under the RBI Retail Direct Scheme.
Vasantlal Nyalchand Kikavat Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The case was reopened pursuant to receipt of certain information from investigation wing, Kolkata wherein it was alleged that the assessee was beneficiary of bogus Long-Term Capital gains (LTCG) by dealing in a scrip namely M/s Unisys Software & Holding Industries Ltd. (in short ‘Unisys’). Accordingly, the case […]
We are not inclined to entertain the petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution in the first instance before this Court. The petitioners have an alternate and efficacious remedy of moving the concerned High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution.
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 4th January, 2022 S.O. 35(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 458 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby delegates its powers under sub-section (11) of section 132 of the said Act to the National Financial Reporting Authority […]
In re Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1: – Whether the GST would be payable on recoveries made from the employees towards providing canteen facility at subsidized rates in the factory and office? Answer: – Answered in the negative. Question 2: – Whether the GST would be payable on the recoveries made from the employees towards […]
