Alkem Laboratories Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Calcutta High Court) Petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents Authority concerned in refunding the admitted refundable amount as indicated in pages 30,31 and 32 of the writ petition which comes around Rs.5,58,54,103.61 in total. Petitioner […]
HC find that authorities not to have adjudicated matter on attending facts and circumstances. All issues of fact and law ought to have been dealt with, even if proceedings were ex parte in nature.
Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry Department of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade Dated: 12.01.2023 Vanijya Bhawan, New Delhi Trade Notice No. 24/2022-23 To, 1. All Regional Authorities of DGFT 2. All Export Promotion Councils 3. All Advance/EPCG Authorisations holders Subject: EODC Online Monitoring System for Advance/EPCG Authorisations – reg Attention of […]
International Financial Services Centres Authority (Investment by International Financial Service Centre Insurance Office) Regulations, 2022
ABB India Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) The Petitioner is a manufacturer of circuit breakers and switch gears of high voltage. The Petitioner exported the goods under ten shipping bills dated 21 January 2008, 5 February 2008, 12 February 2008, 4 March 2008, 11 March 2008, 11 June, 2008, 5 June, 2008, […]
DSV Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) There was no forwarding, not even an effort to forward, the draft assessment order to the correct address, or at least the address furnished to the Assessing Officer under proviso to rule 127(2), within the permitted time frame under Section 153 r.w.s 144C of the Income Tax […]
Sudhan Chandra Basak Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) This application is filed on basis of some undisputed facts that orders of penalty were passed against applicant under Sections 271(1)(a), 271(1)(c) and 273(b) of Income Tax Act for late filing of return for Assessment Year 1983-84. These orders were challenged by way of three […]
ITAT held that when assessee filed return of income well before due date, but due to inadvertence, not filed independent auditor’s report, which it has filed later on, the claim of assessee /- under section 80P(2)(d) of Income-tax Act, 1961, if otherwise admissible, cannot be denied.
Cost of transportation if collected in addition to price of goods and shown separately in invoice, needs to be excluded from assessable value.
Pathankot Hindu Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) In this case assessee claimed the loss on diminution value of securities as well as stock. The main grievance of the revenue is that this particular value was not taken in the books of accounts. But factually correct that the circular of the CBDT has […]
