In re Awas Bandhu (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) As Section 97 (1) r/w Rule 104 of the CGST/SGST Act, the Applicant is liable to pay fee of Rs 5000/- under each Act to be deposited in manner provided u/s 49 of CGST Act. Failing such compliance, an application is incomplete and thus liable to be […]
In re Concepts India (GST AAR Haryana) In light of the above discussion, the Authority for Advance Ruling holds that the product manufactured and supplied by the applicant i.e. PP non-woven bags are covered under Heading 3923 in the sub-heading 3923 29 90 (other) and taxable at 18% (9% CGST and 9% HGST). FULL TEXT […]
In re Indo Prosoya Foods Pvt Ltd (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) (i) Input Credit attributable to the supply of de-oiled rice bran cake (exempted supply) is to be reversed by the appellant in terms of Section 17(2) of the CGST Act 2017; and (ii) GST @ 5 is payable on supply of de-oiled mahua cake […]
The applicant in its application for rectifying an Order No. 22 for Advance Ruling issued by Authority for Advance Ruling on 25.01.2019, submitted that in online application, name of the company and GSTIN were correctly filled but while submitting the hard copy of application form GST ARA-01 name of the company and GSTIN were in advertently submitted Rudhrabhishek Enterprises Limited and GSTIN 09AAGCR1735A1ZP instead of Rudrabhishek Enterprises Limited and GSTIN 09AAACR0707L2ZD.
In re R. R. Enterprises (GST AAR Haryana) Whether the provision of services (Manpower Supply) of tube well operator for operation of tube well and booster of drinking and irrigation water supply in various villages covered under Panchayat are exempt or taxable? It is case of the applicant that services supplied by it are exempted, […]
Before taking up the application for consideration, the Applicant vide letter No. BAL/GST-Corres/134 dated 05.02.2019 informed in writing to withdraw the application filed under Section 97 of CGST/OGST Act,2017. Since, the Applicant is no more desirous of the ruling sought for the application for withdrawal is hereby allowed.
In re Autometers AlliancgoodsPvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) From the characteristic of the Vigilance Control Device (VCD), Diagnostic Terminal (DT) & Master Controller System (MCS), chapter Notes, Classification Rules and above discussion, they all fall in Code 8530 10 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, […]
In re Rudhrabhishek Enterprises Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Whether the Project Development Service (i.e. Detailed project Report Service) and Project Management Consultancy Services (PMCS) provided by the applicant to recipient under the contract of SUDA; and the Project Management Consultancy Services (PMC) under the Contract for PMAY would qualify as an activity in relation […]
In re General Mills India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) In respect of point (i) to the grounds of Appeal, we hold that the use of the name of the Applicant i.e. ‘General Mills India Pvt. Ltd on the packaging for supply of Products by the Applicant solely for the limited purpose of complying […]
In re SPFL Securities Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Question – Taxability on delayed payment charges on reimbursement of amount by client to applicant, where client failed to pay amount paid to stock Exchanges for purchase of securities with T+1 (Trading day plus one day) under SEBI regulation norms and deducted by Stock Exchange from […]
