Understand the landmark case of Maqsood Ali Vs ITO, where the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi ruled against imposing a penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance of statutory notices given reasonable cause.
Understand the pivotal judgment of CESTAT in the case between National Power Engineering Company and the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, where no penalty was imposed after entire service tax and interest were paid before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice.
Delve into the recent ITAT Bangalore case of Balram Corporate Services Pvt Ltd Vs ITO, discussing the non-retrospective nature of late fee charges under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act.
CBIC Circular No. 192/04/2023-GST provides clarification on charging interest for wrong availment of IGST credit and its reversal under section 50(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. The circular addresses the utilization of wrongly availed IGST credit for interest calculation and the exclusion of compensation cess credit.
Learn about the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s (DGFT) Advance Authorisation Scheme, enabling duty-free import of inputs for export purposes. Explore the significant enhancements in the Advance Authorisation and Norms Fixation Workflow, simplifying the process and improving ease of doing business.
Explore the details of the case between Voith Siemens Hydro Private Limited and ACIT regarding transfer pricing proceedings. Analyze the expenses incurred for engineering services and administrative support services, the examination of invoices, and the arguments presented. Understand the outcome and implications of the case.
Explore the Orissa High Court’s recent ruling in the case of Chirag Industries vs the Additional Commissioner of State Tax, where coercive actions for GST arrears recovery were suspended pending a writ petition
A.P. Processor judgment of High Court is affirmed by Hon’ble Supreme Court. The issue is regarding the measure of levy of tax on dyeing units. The High Court had held that no tax would be imposed on wastage generated through the process. Only the goods which are embedded in the final cloth would be taxable as those are the only goods in which the property had been transferred as the process in question is works contract.
Read about the recent judgment by the Delhi High Court in the case of Advance Systems vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST, where the court ruled that once an appeal has been successful before the appellate authority, no fresh refund applications are required.
In-depth review of the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the case of CIT Vs L.G. Electronics Inc. Korea, highlighting key aspects and the implications of the ruling.
