Amit Mitra say that What pains me the most is the fact that GST Council meetings have become acrimonious, vexing and almost toxic with erosion of mutual trust that had held fast between States and the Centre since the inception of the GST Council.
DCIT Vs Monster.Com (India) Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) In the assessee’s own case the Tribunal observed that the assessee followed appropriate revenue recognition method of accounting and thus the income declared on proportional receipt basis cannot be questioned. This order was followed by the ITAT in the assessee’s own case in the A.Ys 2007-08 to […]
In re Rotary Club of Bombay Bayview (GST AAR Maharashtra) The applicant has submitted a letter via email dated 04.06.2021 and requested that they may be allowed to voluntarily withdraw their subject application tiled on 20.07.2020. The request of the applicant to withdraw their application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed, without going into the […]
The applicant ‘Rotary Club of Bombay Mid Town’ has submitted a letter via email dated 03.06.2021 and requested that they may be allowed to voluntarily withdraw their subject application filed on 20.07.2020.
Q.1 What is Form 35? If you are aggrieved by an order of an Assessing Officer (AO), you can file an appeal against the same before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by submitting duly filled Form 35 online on the e-Filing portal. Q.2 Who can use Form 35? Any assessee / deductor who wants […]
Court on its own motion Vs State of West Bengal and others (Calcutta High Court) There is a need to develop a mechanism whereby wasteful expenditure on purchase of medicines in different hospitals and also the medical colleges which are not required and have to be thrown in dustbin after its expiry, need to be […]
E. Palaniappan Vs ITO (Madras High Court) It is not the case of the appellant/assessee that the sugarcane in its original form could not be marketed by him. The conversion of sugarcane into jaggery is also not an essential process to make sugarcane marketable. In the decision in CIT Vs. H.G. DATE (1971) reported in […]
Balaji Agencies Vs Special Chief Secretary to Government (Andhra Pradesh High Court) Since the turnover of the petitioner for the 1st quarter ending 30.06.2006 was Rs.13,14,724/- which exceeded Rs.10 lakhs, the petitioner had an opportunity to apply for registration as VAT dealer. As per Rule (5) of A.P. VAT Act, the petitioner was required to […]
CIT Vs Ramananda Adigalar Foundation (Madras High Court) Issue Raised Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right In holding ¢hat the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation on the assets jn the form of application of income, even though cost of purchase of asset was treated as […]
Pursuant to directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, following Practice Directions are issued to all Courts dealing with cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, in Telangana State.
