In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made against the applicant in the FIR and considering the admitted position that the applicant is arrested on 08.07.2019 and the fact that till date even after passage of 60 days, neither any complaint nor chargesheet is filed and therefore, the applicant would be entitled for default bail, without going into detail at this stage
In re Shree Rajarajeshwari and Company (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the Classification of Pulpwood supplied to paper mills and the rate of tax (GST) thereon? In this regard a Circular was issued by the Government of India bearing Circular number 80/54/2018-GST dated 31-12-2018 stating that representation had been received seeking clarification on applicability of […]
In re Volvo Eicher Commercial Vehicles Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the supplies made by the Applicant to Volvo Sweden is a supply of services and Whether the supplies by the Applicant amounts to export of services to Volvo Sweden and hence zero rated under GST law? Applicant-M/s Volvo-Eicher Commercial Vehicles Limited is not charging […]
In re Ansys Software Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) a) Whether Marketing & Pre-Sales Technical Support Services provided by the applicant will be classified as Intermediary services in terms of Section 2(13) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The Marketing and Pre-sales Technical Support Services provided by the applicant will be classified […]
In re S.R.K Ladders (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the Classification of the goods manufactured by the dealer ‘Agriculture Tree Climbing Apparatus-Unipole Manually operated’- Principal raw material being Aluminium. In the instant case the goods in question “Agricultural Tree Climbing apparatus-Unipole Manually operated” is an agricultural implement and hence in common parlance it can be […]
In re Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited is liable to deduct GST TDS under section 51 of CGST Act on the payments made to suppliers? The issue before us to decide is whether the applicant falls under any of the categories of the persons […]
In re Hical Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the value of free of cost supplied by principal not to be included in value of supply by job worker? The nature of supply done by the applicant is one composite supply consisting of two supplies – one relating to the manufacturing service on the […]
In re Banayan Tree Advisors (p) Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether they need to charge GST on the Portfolio Management Services provided to Non-resident client, where the client pays fee in foreign currency from their overseas account to the account of the Portfolio manager? It is clearly evident from the above that the place of […]
In re Morigeri Traders (GST AAR Karnataka) 1) Whether the applicant is required to be registered under the GST Act? If the answer to the above question is affirmative, then under which section the Commission Agents are to be registered? The applicant, being a commission agent, is required to be registered under Section 22(1) of […]
In re DLF Limited (GST AAR Haryana) Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the […]
