In re Jewel Classic Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) The applicant has preferred the application for seeking advance ruling on various issues but it has failed to frame any question. Instead of posing any question before the authority, the applicant has given a description of the activities undertaken by it. The applicant was also […]
In re Tata Sia Airlines Limited (GST AAR Haryana) Now, to decide the method of distribution of input tax credit from HO to BO, it is pertinent to discuss the relevant provisions regarding ‘input service distributor’. The term ‘input service distributor’ is defined under section 2(61) of the CGST Act, as under: “Input Service Distributor” […]
In re Imperial Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Whether ‘LABORATORY REAGENT’ is classifiable under Tariff Heading 38220090 at S.No.80 of Schedule II oras “Goods which are not specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI” at Sl. No. 453 of Schedule III under the CGST Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, […]
In re Dee Vee Projects Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Q1. What is rate of tax applicable to the composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of Section 2 of Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (The Act), undertaken by the supplier (applicant) i.e., whether the GST rate 18% or 12% is […]
In re Nani Resorts and Floriculture Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Whether the applicant taxpayer is to pay tax @ 6% + 6% (after availing land abatement= 4%+4%) availing the input tax & as provided under notification 11 & t7 of 2017 under CGST Act & notification 46 & 74 of 2017 under HGST Act. Or […]
The instant petition is regarding seeking permission for revision of Form GST TRAN – 1 in conformity with the returns filed under the existing laws that stand repealed by the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (“CGST”)
Jadhav Kangralkar Builders Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) We find that there is no dispute regarding the business of assessee and earning Rs.200/- extra over and above regular income for selling 37,752 sq. ft. in Aayodhya Nagari project. From the day one i.e. from date of survey as discussed above, the assessee was contended the amount […]
In re Vilas Chandanmal Gandhi (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority confirmed the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Autority Order by holding that the sale of TDR/FSI would be leviable to GST under Heading 9972, at the rate of 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST), as prescribed under the entry at Sl. No. 16 (iii) of Notification […]
Whether GST is applicable on nominal amount recovered by Applicants from their employees for usage of employee bus transportation facility in non-air conditioned bus.
Rajive And Company Vs. Assistant Commissioner Special Circle (Kerala High Court) Petitioners will no doubt be entitled to seek copies of the documents seized from their premises, if and when they are confronted by the respondents with any notice or other proceeding, wherein reliance is placed on the said seized documents. I, therefore, make it […]
