Hexagon- MIDCO India Private Ltd. Vs CIT Appeals (ITAT Mumbai) Learned Sr. DR fairly agreed that in case the holding company MIDCO Limited has deducted the TDS on salary paid to these employees no further requirement of TDS on principle but assessee has to produce evidence before the Assessing Officer. Hence, on Principle, we are […]
Guduru Chandra Sekhar Vs Union of India (Andhra Pradesh High Court) In the instant case, though the petitioner herein initially filed appeal on 17.08.2020, before the Commissioner Of Customs and Central Tax (Appeals), it is clear from Form-CAI that the appellant undertook to pay the mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% of the disputed amount but did […]
CBDT specifies the sovereign wealth fund, namely, the Norfund, Government of Norway, as the specified person for the purposes of the said clause in respect of the investment made by it in India on or after the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette but on or before the 31st day of March, 2024
In re Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation (GST AAR Karnataka) Any person registered or desirous of obtaining registration under CGST Act 2017 can seek advance ruling only in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken. In the instant case, we observe that M/s HDMC, who have filed […]
In-Re Inhuman Condition At Quarantine Centres And For Providing Better Treatment To Corona Positive Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Economy, economy and economy is the only tune that the government is all the time harping upon, but bread and butter if you take to a person who needs oxygen and medication, it will be […]
Explore the case of Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore). Analysis of service tax demand on free services and warranty labor, with references to legal precedents and departmental decisions.
Deific Abode LLP Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) The fundamental point of contention, as advanced by Mr. Khaitan, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, is the unconscionable and illegal ‘retrospective applicability’ of the 1988 Act, leading to these proceedings. When the matter was last taken up, Mr. Khaitan had conspicuously […]
Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Photography Services were availed by the appellant for capturing the business events which are necessary to keep record of the events conducted as well as for future reference hence this service also falls within the definition of Input Service. Further, with regard […]
Office Order No.103 of 2021 [Extension of ad-hoc appointment to the grade of JCIT from 01.01.2021 to 31.12.2021 or till these officers are appointed to the grade of JCIT on regular basis, whichever is earlier] F. No. A-3201211212019-Ad.VI Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes} ***** North Block, […]
Boota Singh Vs State of Haryana (Supreme Court) The evidence in the present case clearly shows that the vehicle was not a public conveyance but was a vehicle belonging to accused Gurdeep Singh. The Registration Certificate of the vehicle, which has been placed on record also does not indicate it to be a Public Transport […]
