SEBI Master Circular on (i) Scheme of Arrangement by Listed Entities and (ii) Relaxation under Sub-rule (7) of rule 19 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957. This Master Circular is a compilation of relevant and updated circulars issued by SEBI which deal with schemes of arrangement and which are operational as on date of […]
SEBI issued Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/DCR2/P/CIR/2021/0661 Dated November 23, 2021 on Publishing Investor Charter and Disclosure of Complaints by Merchant Bankers on their Websites. Securities and Exchange Board of India Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/DCR2/P/CIR/2021/0661 Dated November 23, 2021 To, All Registered Merchant Bankers Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Publishing Investor Charter and Disclosure of Complaints by Merchant Bankers on […]
SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/DIL1/P/CIR/2021/0660 Dated November 23, 2021 on Non-compliance with certain provisions of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (ICDR Regulations). Securities and Exchange Board of India Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/DIL1/P/CIR/2021/0660| Dated: November 23, 2021 To All the Recognized Stock Exchanges Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Non-compliance with certain provisions of SEBI (Issue of […]
Additional quantity of 303 MT of raw sugar, for export to USA, under TRQ, upto 31.12.2021, has been notified vide Public Notice No. 39/2015-2020 – DGFT Dated: 23rd November, 2021. MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department of Commerce) (DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE) New Delhi Public Notice No. 39/2015-2020 – DGFT | Dated: 23rd November, […]
Navrathan Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ADIT (ITAT Bangalore) Explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act, 2021 proposing amendment in section 36(1)(va) as well as section 43B is applicable only from 01.04.2021. These provisions impose a liability on an assessee and therefore cannot be construed as applicable with retrospective effect unless the legislature specifically says so. In […]
PCIT Vs Vaidya Panalalmanilal (HUF) (Gujarat High Court) The materials on record would suggest that there was no dispute at the hands of the Revenue that the sale consideration arising out of the sale of the capital asset was used for acquisition of a new asset and that such newly acquired asset was also shown […]
PCIT Vs Shailja Pasricha (Delhi High Court) Assessing Officer had in fact invoked Section 50C of the Act claiming that the sale consideration of Rs. 18 Crores received by the respondent was below the Circle Rate. This was clearly ignoring the fact that the sale consideration was in fact Rs. 35 Crores. The CIT(A) and […]
Rakesh Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) As per the details of the three properties in which the assessee has claimed to have invested sale consideration of the land in question, only one property i.e. at sl. no. 1 of the list reproduced in para ‘6’ above is a constructed house and two others are only […]
PCIT Vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Calcutta High Court) The short issue which falls for consideration is whether the exercise of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax-14 (Kolkata) (CIT) under Section 263 of the Act was just and proper. The Tribunal considered the factual position and noted that the CIT was of the opinion […]
Insecticides India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of C G & S T, Jammu (CESTAT Chandigarh) It is an admitted fact that earlier orders of this Tribunal have been accepted by the Revenue and no appeal has been filed against those orders. In the absence of any challenge to the orders of this Tribunal, the adjudicating authority […]
