We are of the view that the appellant should be permitted to remit the taxes, as quantified in the Form-3 declaration issued to the appellant, subject to of course by also paying interest @ 15% from 01.07.2020 till the date of remittance, which we shall fix as on or before 17.09.2021. If the appellants comply with the said condition, then the appropriate authority under the SVLDR Scheme shall consider the appellant’s application and proceed in accordance with the provisions of the said Scheme.
Ajay Kumar Shukla Vs Arvind Rai (Supreme Court of India) Right to promotion is not considered to be a fundamental right but consideration for promotion has now been evolved as a fundamental right. In this case The plea to defend the seniority list prepared contrary to the statutory provisions on the ground of delay would […]
DRAFT NOTARIES (AMENDMENT) BILL ISSUED FOR STAKEHOLDERS’ CONSULTATION To give opportunity to young eligible legal practitioners aspiring to serve as Notary Public, the draft Bill proposes to restrict the renewal of certificates of practice of Notaries up to two terms The Notaries Act, 1952 was enacted by the Parliament to regulate the profession of Notaries. […]
Jovex International Vs Commissioner, Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi) In this case applicable section for grant of interest is Section 35FF, which provides for grant of interest on the amount refundable pursuant to order of the Appellate Court. It is further provided in this section that interest should be granted from the date of deposit till […]
e-Form ADJ – Memorandum of Appeal Part I – Law(s) Governing the eForm ADJ Section and Rule Number(s) eForm ADJ is required to be filed pursuant to section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 4(1) of Companies(Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 which is reproduced for your reference. Section 454: (1) The Central Government […]
United Waterproofing Corporation Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We note that Ld. CIT(A) has enhanced the addition on account of bogus purchases to 100% of the bogus purchases as against 12.5% applied by the AO. The only reason given by the Ld. CIT(A) is that the assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of purchases and […]
Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the issue of SCN and culmination of the same in the impugned order in the name of amalgamating company is ex facie illegal and liable to be set aside. As issue of notice i.e., SCN and assessment qua a non-existent entity (albeit a juristic person) is a jurisdictional error warranting interference in writ jurisdiction is learned counsel’s say.
Following documents have to be attached for registration of Sale Component of Redevelopment Projects: Resolution / NoC from Society/Association of residents of the rehabilitation component confirming the Promoter’s rights to undertake the redevelopment project. LoI / NoC / Equivalent Document from the Planning Authority confirming Promoter’s rights to undertake the redevelopment project.
t is informed that the functionality in ITBA for passing Give Effect Orders through Web Service on Processing u/s 143(1) of the Income-tax Act’ 1961 for A.Y. 2016-17 was deployed earlier. Now functionality for Give Effect on Assessment through Web service for A.Y. 2016-17 is also live in ITBA w.e.f. 29.10.2021.
The Income Tax Department initiated a search and seizure operation on a prominent Kolkata-based Group, engaged in manufacturing of TMT Bars and structural construction materials etc. on 01.12.2021. The search action covered more than 20 premises spread over West Bengal and Odisha. The action unearthed various methods of tax evasion adopted by the group. A large number of […]
