High Court rules in favor of petitioner Amrik Singh, extending OTS payment deadline. Get insights on the DCB Bank case in Punjab and Haryana High Court
Adroit Industries (India) Ltd. Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Facts of the case are not in dispute to the effect that the petitioner during the relevant period i.e. 2015-20 was entitled to avail the benefit of MEIS but could not avail of such benefit as the concerned staff did not declare the […]
In any proceedings before Appellate Authority/ Adjudicating Authority the appellant/respondent, shall give his consent to avail facility of personal hearing before such authority, through Video conferencing at the time of filing his appeal or immediately after issuance of this instruction, in case pending appeals/adjudication matter. He should also indicate his e-mail address for correspondence, etc.
Revenue submits that said civil structure may be used for commerce or business. We hold that a School building will be used by State Government for education and cannot be considered a commercial building.
Modern Syntex Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise (Gujarat High Court) The grievance of the writ-applicant is that the final GST assessment proceedings are yet to be undertaken. No final assessment order has been passed till this date. We have gone through the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondents. We do not […]
Commissioner of Customs II JNPT Vs Axiom Cordages Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Impugned order of CESTAT and the appeal memo clearly indicates that the main controversy which arises for determination is in the nature of classification dispute, which relates directly and proximately to the rate of duty applicable for the purpose of assessment and therefore the […]
St. John CFS Part Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court, Madurai Bench) Taking note of the pendency of the merger proceedings, the parent company namely, M/s.St.John Freight System Limited, deposited the money as directed by the conditional order. The Tribunal has refused to accept such deposit as a proper compliance with […]
Freight Link Logistics Vs The Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) In the present case, it is not disputed that M/s. Vaaraahi Traders are licensed to import goods and that their IE Code is valid. The case set up by the department is that the goods imported are for the use / purchase of Shri A. […]
Jagdish Pala Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the Appellant are engaged in the construction of Residential and Commercial Complexes and received the booking amount as well as instilment amount from his buyers. Revenue proceeded against them on the ground that they have evaded payment of Service Tax on […]
As a matter of facts, the income tax Act in section 251 of the I.T.Act dealing with the power of ld.CIT(A) does not provide for any power to the ld.CIT(A) to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
