Having regard to the term of service of the petitioners, they had qualifying service, making them eligible for pension as per the Pension Rules. Petitioners are thus not entitled to claim the condonation of the interruption in their services to enhance their pension.
Bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contract or arrangement,
Ramesh Chander Agarwala Vs State Bank of India (NCLAT Delhi) It is true that in Ravi Ajit Kulkarni’s case this Tribunal has in paragraph 44 of the Judgment has laid down that limited notice by the Adjudicating Authority also be given to the Personal Guarantors. In the preset case, although no limited notice as contemplated […]
HC held that we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed without going into the merit of the assessment only on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy. This writ petition is dismissed with costs of Rs. 10,000/- upon Mr. Somak Basu, learned Advocate because of his rude behavior in Court and addressing to the chair in highly disrespectful manner.
Narinder Garg Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (Supreme Court) In P. Mohanraj & Others v. Shah Brothers Ispat Private Limited, (2021) 6 SCC 258, a Bench of three-Judges of this Court considered the matter whether a corporate entity in respect of which moratorium had become effective could be proceeded against in terms of Sections 138 […]
PCIT Vs Universal Music India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Notice under Section 263 was issued by CIT on two issues, namely, (a) disallowance of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) paid of Rs.10,72,532/- included in miscellaneous expenses and not allowed by the Assessing Officer and (b) provision of Rs.1,40,98,685/- in respect of slow moving and absolete […]
Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) HC held that Petitioners are allowed to file and correct TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 Form. In case it is not possible to file the same online, it shall be filed manually. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT 1 In all these matters, the […]
Lokhandwala Construction Industries Private Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) Once a query is raised during assessment proceedings and assessee has replied to it, it follows that the query raised was a subject matter of consideration of the Assessing Officer while completing the assessment. It is not necessary that an assessment order should contain reference […]
Tvl. Asian Paints Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to accept the bank guarantee equivalent to the disputed penalty amount of Rs.25,86,662/- in accordance with the provisions of Section 129(1)(c) of the CGST Act, […]
Plutus Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) We find the Assessing Officer in the instant case made addition of Rs.1,36,39,191/- u/s 68 of the Act in respect of unsecured loan obtained by the assessee from three directors on the ground that the assessee failed to substantiate with evidences to his satisfaction regarding creditworthiness of […]
