Extension of validity of project registration under MAHARERA would be granted, on promoters complying with the directions issued under Order No. 7 of 2019 dated 08.02.2019.
As per prosecution case, some unknown persons entered into the house of the informant and told that they are Income Tax Officials and thereafter they started searching his house. The accused persons took away rupees twenty lacs alongwith gold jwellery.
Explore Apar Industries vs Union of India case in Bombay High Court. Petition on transition and distribution of CENVAT Credit. Key details and court directives.
B M Autolink Vs C.C.E.-Kutch (Gandhidham) (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the fact is not under dispute that the appellant being a dealer purchase the vehicles from M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and subsequently sell the same to various customers. The transaction between M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and the dealer and subsequently sale transaction […]
(1) These rules may be called the Central Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2022. (2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
Considering the provision of Section 68 that the assessee has to prove three conditions i.e. (i) identity of the creditor; (2) capacity of such creditor to advance money; and (iii) genuineness of the transactions. If all the aforesaid three conditions are proved, the burden shifts on the revenue to prove that the amount belong to the assessee. However, the assessee cannot be asked to prove source of source or the origin of origin.
PCIT Vs Karuna Garg (Delhi High Court) PCIT states that ITAT has erred in deleting the additions on account of bogus Long-Term Capital Gain on sale of penny stock company namely M/s Goldline International Finvest Ltd. on the ground that the assessing officer has not made independent enquiry. ITAT held that In the absence of […]
HC held that Mere issuance of show cause notice or letters of personal hearing to an assessee is not adequate. Assessing Officer is required to record a finding that notices were issued and served upon the assessee but despite service of notice the assessee did not come forward to contest the proceeding.
Prakash Purohit Vs Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court) It is not disputed that appeal against cancellation of the GST registration can be filed within three months which can be extended by a further period of 30 days. The petitioner filed the e-appeal on 27.09.2022 but could not submit the hard-copy. The […]
Petitioner must file the stay petition before the National Faceless Appeal Centre and not before the jurisdictional Appellate Commissioner, who has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal/stay petition filed by the petitioner after the National Faceless Appeal Assessment/Appeal scheme came into force.
