In the case of J. Kishorekumar Vs ITO, Madras High Court examines tax notices issued to deceased assessee’s legal representative, offering detailed insights into legal implications and proceedings.
Penalties for violating Section 197 of Companies Act as company paid managerial remuneration to a director exceeding requisite approvals
Company Secretaries in Practice are allowed to be registered as Trade Marks Agent under Rule 144 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, read with the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 and the Regulations made thereunder.
Admittedly, the assessee had got the books of account audited for the first time for the relevant assessment year. Prior to the relevant assessment year, the assessee was under the bonafide belief that only the gross commission receipts are to be taken as turnover for the purpose of audit.
The IP submitted that in order to realize the maximum value for all stakeholders, the liquidator is maintaining the business of the CD on going concern basis as recommended by the CoC. He submitted that the CD was intended to be liquidated as a going concern through e auction mode as provided in IBBI (Liquidation […]
The valuation report is based on the professional opinion of the valuer backed by his expertise and skills. Therefore, a valuation report is inherently remains subjective in nature. However, it must be kept in mind that the reliability of the valuation report increases with enhanced reliance on objective criteria. Therefore, it is necessary that all […]
Explore the case of Dr. Shivajirao Jondhale Research Foundation vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai), where the tribunal remanded the issue of registration under section 80G back to the Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption for fresh consideration, citing principles of natural justice.
Explore the detailed analysis of CAAR Mumbai’s ruling on the classification of roasted areca nuts under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Understand the implications of roasting processes and legal interpretations.
Explore the detailed judgment of Ravinder Kumar vs. State of Haryana, Punjab and Haryana High Court, involving forgery allegations. Legal experts weigh in on the bail decision and its implications.
Kiran Agarwal challenges an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, citing jurisdictional issues. Calcutta High Court quashes the order due to non-compliance with approval formalities.
