Kindly refer to letter F. No. DGIT(S)/ADG(S)-2/CASS 2017- 18/143/2016 dated 03.07 2017 and F. No. DGIT(S)/ADG(S)-2/CASS 2017-18/143/2016 dated 18.09.2017 requiring Assessing officers to generate scrutiny notices u/s 143(2) (or PANs selected in cycle 1 and cycle 2 of CASS- 2017.
To reduce interest rate risk in a debt portfolio, mutual funds may hedge the portfolio or part of the portfolio (including one or more securities) on weighted average modified duration basis by using Interest Rate Futures (IRFs).
F.No. 394/97/2017-Cus (AS) Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs (Anti-Smuggling Unit) ***** 512, Hudco Vishala Building, Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. dated 27.09.2017 To All Principal Chief/Chief Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Preventive), All Principal Chief/Chief Commissioners of Customs and Central Tax/ Central Excise, All […]
Where the assessee failed to specify manner in which undisclosed income was derived and also failed to deposit due taxes then the assessee failed to satisfy the conditions specified under section 271AAA(2) and hence, immunity from penalty was not available to assessee.
If the unaccounted expenditure incurred is from the on money received by the assessee, then, the question of making any addition u/s 69C does not arise because the source of the expenditure is duly explained. It is only the ‘on money’ which can be considered for the purpose of taxation.
Where notice was not issued by assessing officer under section 143(2) before passing order under section 143(3) read with section 147, assessment made by him was bad in law. Provisions of section 292BB are not applicable where there is failure to issue notice under section 143(2).
High Court held that (I) We hold that e-recharge is not covered by the Item No. 133 of the Government Notification dated 28th March 2013 and that in any event, LBT cannot be levied on erecharge; (II) We reject the contention of the petitioner that the LBT is not payable on the SIM cards and […]
Where material was found in course of search at third party assessee that assessee had claimed bogus expenditure of 1 crore, towards which assessee had surrendered Rs. 50 lakhs and for balance 50 lakhs, it failed to provide any evidence, then it was made clear that onus of showing that balance expenditure was justified, lay upon assessee. Since assessee failed to discharge onus, AO was justified in bringing to tax the said expenditure.
SEBI (International Financial Services Centers) Guidelines, 2015 were issued on March 27, 2015. Subsequently, vide circular CIR/MRD/DSA/41/2016 dated March 17, 2016, SEBI has specified that Commodity Derivatives shall be eligible as securities for trading and the stock exchanges operating in IFSC may permit dealing in commodity derivatives.
SEBI in the past has taken several steps to tackle the menace of Unauthorized Trades viz Periodic Running Account Settlement, Post transactions SMS/email by exchanges/Depositories, Ticker on broker/DP websites etc. It was observed that in spite of measures taken, a considerable proportion of investor complaints is of the nature of Unauthorized Trades.
