Ernst And Young Limited Vs Additional Commissioner CGST (Delhi High Court) In the present case, the petitioner has provided professional services in terms of the service agreements to overseas entities (EY Entities). It had issued the invoices for the said services directly to EY Entities and had received the invoiced consideration from EY Entities, in […]
Manishkumar Tulsidas Kaneriya Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) Section 144, contemplates providing the assessee an opportunity of being heard before making assessment. The First Proviso mentions that such opportunity shall be given by the assessing officer by serving notice to the assessee, mentioning date and time for completion of the assessment to the best of […]
The impugned notice, other than merely quoting that the Insight portal contains information as stated by the Assessing Officer in his reasons for the reopening, does not further investigate the information or come to an independent assessment connecting the petitioner to the particular transactions specified in the information.
These regulations may be called the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (Redressal of Subscriber Grievance) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023.
It is advised that Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC has ceased to be a banking company within the meaning of Banking Regulation Act, 1949
Applicant seeks interpretation of GST law with respect to doctrine of mutuality and relationship of applicant association with its members. The said interpretation of law is not mandated to Advance Ruling Authority for ruling under Section 97(2).
Signatories/directors cannot escape from their penal liability under Section 138 of NI Act by citing its dissolution. What is dissolved, is only company, not personal penal liability of accused covered under Section 141 of NI Act.
Nothing in Safety Glass (Quality Control) Order, 2020 shall apply to import of safety glass by a vehicle manufacturer for manufacturing up to ten thousand vehicles manufactured in India per financial year
SEBI permitted use of e- wallet for investment in Mutual Funds within the umbrella limit of INR 50,000 for investments by an investor through both e-wallet and/or cash, per Mutual Fund per financial year.
In re Monalisa Co-Operative Housing Society Limited (AAAR Maharashtra) In the instant case, outgoing member of the society, Mr Sanjay Prakash Sahjwani, has made payment of Rs 17,70,000/- to the society which appellant claims to be voluntary contribution on his own will and volition. On bare perusal of the affidavit submitted by the appellant in […]
