Supreme Court of India in this case was considering the meaning of the term diversification when the appellant in this case set up machinery for manufacture of Double LIP DRY BLEND CROWN CORK as against SPUN LINE CROWN CORK which was being manufactured earlier and contended that it was diversification to be eligible for exemption.
Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise Vs Ashirwad Foundries Private Limited And Anr (Calcutta High Court) Whether central excise can move against legal heirs of a deceased person to recover the penalty imposed under Act. The Division bench of Calcutta High Court in this case was dealing with an important matter where the Department filed […]
Calcutta HC order in on how an order should not be drafted where Tribunal adopted finding of CIT(A) verbatim as its own findings
Kamal Nath Vs PCIT (Calcutta High Court) What are the grounds on which transfer of assessment records/jurisdiction can be challenged u/s 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961? In this high profile case relating to ex-chief minister of Madhya Pradesh, when Dr A M Singhvi along with Mr JP Khaitan represented the petitioner before Hon’ble Justice […]
Shekhar Resorts Limited Vs Union of India (Supreme High Court) An interesting question arose before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India when the appellant had filed an application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 within the due date as prescribed and the application was accepted and necessary forms were issued for payment of […]
Rifle Factory Co-operative Society Ltd Vs ACIT (Calcutta High Court) Whether demand in pursuance of order of assessment can be pursued without disposing off the petition for stay of demand. The Single Bench of Calcutta High Court in this case was dealing with a situation where without disposing off the petition for stay of demand, […]
Whether ITAT has the power to entertain additional ground without recording reasons and without following Rule 46A of the Income-tax rules, 1962 and whether jurisdictional issue relating to non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) can be raised at any time?
Map Refoils India Limited Vs National E-Assessment Centre (Gujarat High Court) No draft assessment along with show cause notice as required under section 144B(1) and section 144B(7) is given to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to give explanation for proposed addition during the hearing before the National Faceless Assessment Centre. Section 144B(1)(xii) […]
Whether on account of non reconciliation of purchases reflected by the party in GSTR 1 without supplying necessary details, the assessment order passed u/s 143(3)/144B is sustainable in law?
Whether an insurance company even after receiving the insurance premium, can refuse to honour its contract when the insured person dies immediately after taking the home loan.
