The Union Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi gives ex-post facto approval for the Government amendments to the Finance Bill, 2021 (enacted on 28th March, 2021 as the Finance Act, 2021).
Hon’ble Madam, we are approaching your honour with a humble request to extend the time for statutory compliances under Goods and Services Tax. The due date for filing GSTR-3B (Monthly Return) is today. Due date for filing GSTR-1 was 11th of April for the monthly details of March, 2021.
Court On Its Own Motion Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (Delhi High Court) Taking suo moto cognizance of the alarming resurgence of Covid-19, under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, it is hereby ordered that in all matters pending before this court and courts subordinate to this court, wherein such […]
he PMT-03 functionality available at present in the online refund module is only for re-crediting of the rejected amount that has been debited at the time of filing of refunds. In order to enable the operationalisation of re-crediting of ITC sanctioned as refund towards tax wrongly paid or paid in excess by debiting the credit ledger, a new enhanced PMT-03 functionality has been developed and deployed in the system.
(a) only urgent matters will be listed for hearing w.e.f. 22.04.2021. and (b) the Advocate-on-Record/Party-in-Person may send signed and verified mentioning-application along with synopsis containing the grounds of urgency not exceeding one page in the fresh matter only by e-mail at the email address [email protected] on working days by 1.00 PM (Monday to Friday) and by 11.30 AM (Saturday) and the same shall be processed for listing on the next to next working day,
Bhavesh Kiritbhai Kalani Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. There are no proceedings against the present petitioner under Sections 62, 63, 64, 67, 73 and 74 of the Act. 2. There is no reason therefore, to invoke section 83 against the writ applicant and proceedings. 3. Since the proceedings are initiated by the […]
Akzo Nobel India Limited Vs Commercial Tax Officer (Telangana High Court) Commercial Tax Officer shall pay costs of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the petitioner, which shall be recovered from the salary of the 1st respondent, and disciplinary action shall be initiated against 1st respondent for non-consideration of material filed by petitioner before […]
In continuation of this Court’s Office Order No.223/RG/DHC/2021 dated 8.4.2021, keeping in view the alarming rise in the Covid-19 cases in the NCT of Delhi, it has been ordered that all the Hon’ble Benches of this Court shall, with effect from 19.04.2021, take up extremely urgent matters filed in the year 2021 only.
State of Punjab & Ors. Vs Tecnimont Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court) FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER Heard Mr. Karan Bharihoke, learned Advocate for State of Punjab and Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, learned counsel for the respondent on caveat. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case on record, in our view, the ends […]
Ashish Natvarlal Vashi Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) 1. Merely cash deposit in a saving bank account does not show that income has escaped assessment. The process of reasoning is absent, and these reasons were not recorded on standalone basis therefore reopening made by the Assessing Officer may be quashed. 2. The amount deposited in the […]
