CESTAT Delhi held that mere failure to pay Excise Duty, not due to fraud or wilful misstatement is not sufficient to attract the extended period of limitation and the Central Excise Officer should have issued notice within one year from the relevant date.
Deify Infrastructures Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The Hon’ble Customs, Excise & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (“CESTAT”) in the matter of M/s. Deify Infrastructures Limited v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Excise & Customs [Final Order No. 51927/2021 dated October 27, 2021], held that the value of […]
Shanthilal Movji Bhai Thakker Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT held that rental income from sub-lease shall be considered as business income as the assesee was engaged in business of real estate development and the property in question was sub-leased in furtherance of their business. Shri Shanthilal Movji Bhai Thakker (“the Appellant”) aggrieved by the order […]
In re Mahavir Nagar Shiv Srushti Co-operative Housing Society Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Where the contractor has provided works contract service for repairs, renovations & rehabilitation, ITC can’t be availed by Housing Society In M/s Mahavir Nagar Shiv Srushti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. [GST-ARA-19/2021-22/B-94 dated November 10, 2021] Hon’ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (MAAR) […]
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors. (Bombay High Court) SCN quashed by Bombay HC for allegedly availing inadmissible transitional credit as has been issued on an erroneous legal premise The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (Bombay HC) in the matter of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Union of […]
AAAR reversed the ruling of AAR which held that GST is applicable on recovery of Notice pay from an employee by employer in lieu of notice period, Telephone charges, Group Medical Insurance Policy recovered from employees and providing Canteen facility to employees free of cost.
AAR held that no separate registration is required for supply of works contract services in Karnataka by M/s L&T, Karnataka by the assessee registered at Noida, Uttar Pradesh as invoice can be raised by the assessee charging IGST from its registered office in Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
Sherly Sany Vs C.C, Cochin (CESTAT Bangalore) It is arbitrary not to give option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation to the person in possession of Gold While quashing an order of the customs authorities, CESTAT, Bangalore held that the order of confiscation without offering an option to pay fine to the person in […]
HC directed the Authority to refund GST worth Rs. 108 crores paid under the wrong head along with applicable interest as the money was lain with the Authority for the past two and a half years.
In re Meerabai Tukaram Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) No GST exemption on renting of property to Govt for under-privileged Girl in absence of Proper Info: AAR AAR, Maharashtra held that, services provided by M/s Meerabai Tukaram Borade (Applicant) to Samaj Kalyan Department (SKD), Government of Maharashtra (GOM), for residential accommodation of underprivileged girls is not […]
