Read about Kerala High Court’s decision on GST registration cancellation due to non-filing of GSTR-3B returns for six months and implications for taxpayers.
In the case of Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Chandigarh quashes service tax demand due to insufficient evidence.
In BOKS Business Services Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of CGST, Delhi, court rules that calling a party an agent in an agreement doesn’t necessarily make them an intermediary for GST purposes.
Explore recent changes in GST regulations regarding ocean freight in CIF contracts, including legal challenges and Supreme Court rulings.
Explore Madras High Court’s decision on M/s. Sakthi Industries’ challenge against CGST Rule amendment in 2023. Analysis and implications discussed.
In a recent case, the Madras High Court ruled that validly availed credit cannot be denied, even if there were mistakes in TRAN-1 returns filed twice. Get insights into the judgment here
Learn about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Cenvat credit for construction services in case of General Motors India. Analysis and implications explained.
Read about Kerala High Court’s verdict in EVM Passenger Cars India Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala, highlighting importance of GST document compliance during goods transportation.
Delhi High Court, in Rahul Kumar Jain and Co. v. Union Of India & Anr., held that GST Registration cannot be cancelled without specific reasons and has imposed a cost of INR 5,000 on Revenue Department.
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand on electrification services, ruling they do not qualify as works contract services. Read detailed case analysis.
