Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka HC to AO: Stay in Your Lane — Not Beyond Section 151A ; Reassessment Penalty Notices Quashed In Zareen Sultana vs ITO, the Karnataka High Court quashed multiple reassessment and penalty notices issued by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2016-17, holding that the AO acted beyond the statutory scope of Section 151A of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner challenged notices under Sections 148, 148A, 147, 144B, 156, and penalty notices under Sections 271F, 271(1)(b), and 271(1)(c), asserting that the proceedings were procedurally ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930