Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka HC to AO: Stay in Your Lane — Not Beyond Section 151A ; Reassessment Penalty Notices Quashed In Zareen Sultana vs ITO, the Karnataka High Court quashed multiple reassessment and penalty notices issued by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2016-17, holding that the AO acted beyond the statutory scope of Section 151A of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner challenged notices under Sections 148, 148A, 147, 144B, 156, and penalty notices under Sections 271F, 271(1)(b), and 271(1)(c), asserting that the proceedings were procedurally ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031