Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Zareen Sultana Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka HC to AO: Stay in Your Lane — Not Beyond Section 151A ; Reassessment Penalty Notices Quashed

In Zareen Sultana vs ITO, the Karnataka High Court quashed multiple reassessment and penalty notices issued by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2016-17, holding that the AO acted beyond the statutory scope of Section 151A of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner challenged notices under Sections 148, 148A, 147, 144B, 156, and penalty notices under Sections 271F

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031