Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muthukuru Venkata Subba Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Muthukuru Venkata Subba Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) CIT(A) Ignored Evidence – ITAT Remands ₹15.55 Cr Addition on Joint Bank Account for Fresh Verification, Cites Violation of Natural Justice; Director’s Liability on Company Funds: ITAT Remands Case to Verify Ownership of Bank Deposits  Assessee, an individual &  Director in M/s Evergreen Entertainers Pvt. Ltd., did not file return of income as his salary income was only ₹52,000. The AO reopened the case u/s 147 after noticing huge credits of ₹9.61 crore in a joint bank account with Andhra Bank, where the joint holders were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930