Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brahm Precision Materials Pvt. Ltd Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brahm Precision Materials Pvt. Ltd Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Pune) Foreign Venture Flopped, But Not the Tax Claim – ITAT Says Business Loss, Not Capital Assessee, a manufacturer of aluminium die-casting and auto components, faced multiple additions by AO, which were mostly confirmed by NFAC/CIT(A). Assessee filed two appeals before ITAT. The appeal for AY 2020-21 was late by 445 days, but ITAT condoned the delay after finding genuine and reasonable cause. Since the issues in both years were common, ITAT passed a consolidated order. Issue 1 – Foreign Investment Written Off (₹97.61 lakh in AY 2018-1...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930