Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saroj Devi Haldiya Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saroj Devi Haldiya Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) No Plot, No Profit, Still Taxed :When AO Shoots the Wrong Person: Middleman Dragged into 56(2)(ix) Tax Trap; Two-Day Show Cause, Zero Natural Justice: ITAT Called to Restore Fair Play! Background Assessee filed return declaring ₹13.37 lakh. Reassessment u/s 147/144B completed at ₹88.72 lakh. Major addition: ₹75,00,000 u/s 56(2)(ix) (forfeited advance). Other disallowances: ₹34,647 (u/s 57) & ₹83,453 (capital loss restriction). CIT(A), NFAC dismissed the appeal ex-parte, stating no proper submissions were filed. Key Facts of the Transactio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930