Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saroj Devi Haldiya Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saroj Devi Haldiya Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) No Plot, No Profit, Still Taxed :When AO Shoots the Wrong Person: Middleman Dragged into 56(2)(ix) Tax Trap; Two-Day Show Cause, Zero Natural Justice: ITAT Called to Restore Fair Play! Background Assessee filed return declaring ₹13.37 lakh. Reassessment u/s 147/144B completed at ₹88.72 lakh. Major addition: ₹75,00,000 u/s 56(2)(ix) (forfeited advance). Other disallowances: ₹34,647 (u/s 57) & ₹83,453 (capital loss restriction). CIT(A), NFAC dismissed the appeal ex-parte, stating no proper submissions were filed. Key Facts of the Transactio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930