DGAP Vs Theco India Pvt. Ltd. (GSTAT)
This case concerns proceedings under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) to determine whether Theco India Pvt. Ltd. had profiteered by not passing the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to its customers following the implementation of GST on 1 July 2017. The DGAP alleged that the company had accrued an undue benefit of ₹1,49,81,077/- from 85 products and sought appropriate action under the Anti-Profiteering provisions.
Background:
The respondent, Theco India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in supplying dental products to hospitals and clinics as a first- or second-stage dealer. Pre-GST, the company paid Countervailing Duty (CVD) at 12.5% and Special Additional Duty (SAD) at 4% on imports. With GST coming into force on 1 July 2017, these duties were replaced by Integrated GST (IGST) at 18%, allowing businesses to avail ITC.
A complaint was lodged on 28 November 2017 by M/s Crown Express Dental Lab, Ranchi, claiming profiteering of ₹4,78,085/- in two products. The DGAP, following referral by the Standing Committee, submitted its first report on 8 June 2018, which the erstwhile National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) received on 31 August 2018. The NAA, in its 28 November 2018 order, directed that the benefit of profiteering be passed to the complainant along with 18% interest and instructed the DGAP to expand the investigation to all products supplied by the respondent.
Investigations:
The DGAP initially reported it was practically difficult to cover all products, but following the NAA’s interim order of 1 August 2019, the investigation was expanded under Rule 133(5)(a) and (b) of the CGST Rules, 2017. A re-investigation concluded on 1 July 2020, calculating total alleged profiteering at ₹1,29,39,594/- for 85 products supplied from 1 July 2017 to 30 August 2019.
The NAA, in its interim order dated 5 August 2022, noted that the accurate calculation of profiteering required analysis of taxes paid by the importer/supplier in the pre-GST period. This would ascertain whether any additional ITC was available to the respondent, which would need to be passed on to recipients. The DGAP was tasked with re-investigating this aspect.
Key Findings of DGAP Reinvestigation (2023):
The DGAP observed:
Comments are closed.