This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
PCIT Cannot Rush u/s 263 Without Giving Assessee Adequate Opportunity
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Muthyala Suryababu Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2020-21
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Muthyala Suryababu Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹12.50 crore. While computing LTCG, he claimed deduction of ₹10,42,815/- towards arrears of property tax, treating it as part of cost of acquisition / improvement. AO, after assessment proceedings, accepted the claim.
On examination of records, PCIT held that arrears of property tax do not fall within “cost of acquisition” or “cost of improvement” as per section 55 r.w.s. 48. Holding that AO failed to verify this aspect, PCIT invoked Explanation 2(a) to section 263, treating the assessment order...




