To help taxpayers avoid these pitfalls, the following key precautions should be kept in mind before finalizing and filing the Annual Returns:
1. Reporting in Table 8D of GSTR-9 should be Zero or any difference reported must have defined reason
Table 8D captures the differences between ITC claimed and ITC available. Any figure reported here is automatically flagged by the system, resulting in SCNs and scrutiny. To avoid unnecessary disputes, taxpayers should ensure that the value reported in this column is Nil or if any difference is required to be reported must have defined reason
2. Minimize ITC Reconciliation difference in Column 12F of GSTR-9C
Column 12F of GSTR-9C deals with ITC reconciliations, often a sensitive area in GST audits. Any mismatch here should either be eliminated or kept to the bare minimum. Where reporting is unavoidable, taxpayers must record a clear justification at the time of filing, which can be referred to later in case of departmental queries.
3. Net ITC claimed in GSTR-3B (Column 4C) should not exceed ITC in GSTR-2B
One of the most common triggers for notices arises when the ITC claimed in GSTR-3B exceeds the ITC reflected in GSTR-2B. Businesses must verify this reconciliation thoroughly to ensure compliance. Any excess claim can not only attract interest and penalty but also raise questions about input credit legitimacy.
4. Credit Notes issued by the supplier and reported at the GSTIN must be carefully reconciled
Businesses should ensure that the ITC in respect of such Credit Notes appearing in GSTR-2B has already been reversed, or that an accurate reconciliation is maintained where the Credit Note is issued merely for invoice reversal and no ITC was availed on the original invoice.
5. Scrutiny of GSTR-2B Data and supplier compliance
Since GSTR-2B reflects supplier invoices, it is vital to check whether corresponding GSTR-3B filings by suppliers are in place. Further, invoices reported under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) must be carefully examined to ensure that GST paid under RCM is not less than the liability reflected in GSTR-2B. This step reduces exposure to mismatches during departmental scrutiny.
6. Accurate Reporting in Columns 12B and 12C of GSTR-9C
Columns 12B and 12C require reconciliation of ITC carried forward from the previous year. Businesses should cross-verify these details with the previous year’s Annual Return. Any mismatch here can create confusion and lead to avoidable departmental queries.
7. Reconciliation of advances received, and GST Paid
Advances received from customers and the GST paid thereon must be reconciled with the General Ledger and reported figures in GSTR-9. Since advances are often overlooked during monthly filings, this step ensures that annual reporting is consistent and compliant.
8. Scrutinize Tax Liability Statement before Filing
The GST system already provides taxpayers with a Tax Liability Statement summarizing variances such as GSTR-1 vs. GSTR-3B, ITC claimed vs. ITC in GSTR-2B, and RCM payable vs. paid. Taxpayers should download this statement, scrutinize it thoroughly, and rectify differences in the Annual Return itself. This pre-emptive check can prevent departmental queries post-filing.
9. Strict Compliance with Credit Notes and Time Limits
Credit notes and corresponding tax adjustments reported in GSTR-1 must strictly adhere to the prescribed time limits for availing set-off. Late or incorrectly reported credit notes are a common cause of notices and disputes. Ensuring timely and accurate reporting here can save businesses from litigation.
Why these precautions matter
Annual Returns consolidate the entire year’s compliance data. Any mismatch, no matter how minor, is easily picked up by the automated systems in place, leading to auto-triggered notices. By following the above precautions in a disciplined manner, taxpayers can:
- Reduce the risk of litigation and notices,
- Maintain clean books and reconciliations,
- Strengthen compliance credibility, and
- Save significant time and resources during GST audits.
The GST regime has matured significantly since its inception, but scrutiny levels have also intensified. Preventive compliance is far more cost-effective than corrective litigation. Businesses must treat the filing of GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C not as a routine exercise but as an opportunity to validate their yearly compliance, plug mismatches, and safeguard against disputes. By diligently observing these precautions, taxpayers can ensure a smooth compliance journey, free from unnecessary complications.
Author Bio
