Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pushpakant Punjalal Chokshi Vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pushpakant Punjalal Chokshi Vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Cash Deposit in HUF’s Account cannot be taxed in Individual’s Hands – ITAT Ahmedabad deletes 69A addition Cash Deposit in HUF’s Account cannot be taxed in Individual’s Hands – ITAT Ahmedabad deletes 69A addition Pushpakant Punjalal Chokshi, proprietor of Chokshi Punjalal Somchand & Sons, engaged in jewellery business, faced an addition of ₹9,23,000/- u/s 69A on account of cash deposits found in an account with Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. AO treated the account as belonging to the individual & taxed the deposits as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders ITAT Holds Section 80AC Bar No Longer Applies, Restores Section 80P Claim View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930