Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Vankadara Padmavathi (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Vankadara Padmavathi (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Addition of Rs.10 Crore under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as Revenue failed to specify whether the addition was being made alleging concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Held: Assessee was proprietor of M/s. Mineral Embassy, which was engaged in procurement and export of iron ore. Assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs. 1,71,350 and was issued statutory notices.  During the course of assessment proceedings, it was found that assessee gave advances to Associated Mining Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930