Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Vankadara Padmavathi (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Vankadara Padmavathi (ITAT Bangalore)

Conclusion: Addition of Rs.10 Crore under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as Revenue failed to specify whether the addition was being made alleging concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.

Held: Assessee was proprietor of M/s. Mineral Embassy, which was engaged in procurement and export of iron ore. Assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs. 1,71,350 and was issued statutory notices.  During the course of assessment proceedings, it was foun

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031