Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinaga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Srinaga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the case of Srinaga vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore), the Bangalore Bench of ITAT ruled that the initiation of penalty under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act must be linked to the assessment proceedings and must be clearly mentioned in the assessment order. The Tribunal also noted that a temporary loan borrowed by the assessee from close family members without any interest could not be classified as a loan or deposit subject to these penalty provisions. The assessee faced penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for accepting and repaying cash loans exceedi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930