Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : MIRC Electronics Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-V) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 85352 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

MIRC Electronics Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-V) (CESTAT Mumbai)

MIRC Electronics Limited challenged a decision by the Commissioner of Customs regarding the classification and duty exemption of imported goods known as “Open Cells” and their associated parts. The dispute centered on whether these items qualified for customs duty exemption under Notification No. 24/2005-Customs. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had ruled that while “Open Cells” fell under CTH 85.24, they did not meet the criteria to be considered “Liquid Crystal Display (LCD)” devices under CTH 85.29, thus not eligible for the duty exemption.

The core issue revolved around interpreting the exemption criteria specified in the notification. The notification exempted goods falling under specific headings or tariff items from customs duties, contingent upon their classification and intended use. The appellants argued that “Open Cells” should be classified under CTH 85.24 and qualified as LCD devices under the HSN Explanatory Note. They contended that these devices were integral to the manufacture of LCD/LED television panels.

However, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) disagreed, emphasizing that while “Open Cells” are crucial components in LCD/LED devices, they alone do not constitute a fully functional LCD. Therefore, they did not meet the specific criteria outlined in the exemption notification for “Liquid Crystal Devices.” The Commissioner did not adequately address the appellants’ technical explanations and did not apply judicial precedents or relevant CBIC instructions effectively in reaching the decision.

Further complicating matters, the appellants pointed out discrepancies in the treatment of their imports across different assessment orders. They argued that inconsistent application of customs duty exemptions under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs added to the confusion, highlighting procedural lapses and lack of a reasoned approach in the assessment process.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031