Case Law Details
In re Hindustan Shipyard Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh)
The case of Hindustan Shipyard Limited before the GST Authority in Andhra Pradesh revolves around determining whether various inputs used in ship construction qualify for concessional GST rates under Entry No.252 of Schedule-I of Notification No.01/2017. Hindustan Shipyard, a government undertaking, sought clarification on whether items like engines, generators, and other equipment are considered integral parts of warships and submarines.
Hindustan Shipyard Limited argued that numerous inputs listed in Annexures 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D, including engines, gearboxes, and propulsion systems, are essential for ship construction and should thus attract a reduced GST rate of 5%. The authority examined definitions of “parts” and precedent cases to assess whether these items meet the criteria for concessional tax rates.
The ruling differentiated between essential parts integral to a ship’s functioning, such as propulsion systems and navigational aids, and non-essential items like furniture and recreational facilities. It referenced judicial interpretations and customs exemptions to establish that only items directly contributing to a ship’s construction or operation qualify for lower GST rates.
Based on the evidence presented and legal interpretations, the GST Authority ruled that items directly contributing to the construction and operation of warships and submarines are eligible for the reduced GST rate under Entry No.252. However, items deemed consumables, tools, or non-essential equipment do not qualify. This decision clarifies the GST implications for Hindustan Shipyard Limited, ensuring clarity on tax treatment for various inputs used in shipbuilding under the GST regime.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
