Introduction: The implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was intended to simplify the tax framework and enhance ease of doing business by unifying the tax structure across India. However, the reality of its enforcement has exposed significant challenges, notably the misuse of discretionary powers by some tax officers, leading to undue harassment of businesses and disruptions in operations.
The Issue at Hand: Instances of GST enforcement overreach is causing significant concern within the industrial and business communities. There are alarming reports of goods being detained under dubious pretenses, businesses being asked to comply with unreasonable demands, and a general environment of mistrust between taxpayers and authorities. These practices not only deviate from the spirit of GST but also threaten the economic principles it seeks to establish.
Examples of Enforcement Excesses:
1. Unwarranted Detention for Non-supply Movements:
- Goods moved for reasons such as weighment within a 20 km radius are allowed without an e-way bill, based solely on a delivery challan. However, there are cases where such goods are detained under the suspicion of ‘clandestine removal’. Officers have been known to demand extensive documentation, including data from the past year, without any legal authority to conduct such invasive investigations during transit. This overreach clearly showcases harassment tactics that go beyond the legal spectrum.
2. Faulty Allegations Regarding Invoice Non-compliance:
- In another example, officers have incorrectly claimed that invoices lack a scannable Invoice Reference Number (IRN) in the QR code, despite evidence to the contrary presented by businesses. There are instances where it appears that documents are deliberately compressed and manipulated before scanning to produce errors. Such tactics suggest a pattern of harassment rather than genuine enforcement of the law.
3. Delayed Release of Detained Goods:
- The law requires that goods detained should be released or an order of detention or a show cause notice should be issued within three days. There are numerous instances where this has not been adhered to, with goods being held for extended periods without any formal procedure being followed, leading to considerable business losses.
4. Ignoring Communication from Taxpayers:
- There is a growing concern that GST officers are refusing to accept or record official communications from taxpayers, such as requests for the release of detained goods or responses to notices. This practice further underscores the potential malpractices and ulterior motives of some officers, compromising the integrity of tax enforcement.
Call for Action:
1. Enhanced Transparency and Fair Enforcement:
- There must be clear, transparent guidelines that prevent officers from misusing their authority. Each action taken against a business must be fully documented and communicated.
2. Accountability for Misconduct:
- Officers found to be engaging in harassment or misusing their powers should face strict penalties. An independent oversight committee could be established to monitor such behaviors and ensure accountability.
3. Immediate Correctional Steps:
- The GST Council and higher judicial authorities have repeatedly clarified the limits and extents of enforcement actions. It is imperative that these guidelines be enforced rigorously and that officers are trained to adhere to them scrupulously.
4. Strengthen Communication Channels:
- Authorities must ensure that all communications from taxpayers are duly acknowledged and recorded. This will help prevent misunderstandings and provide a clear trail of interaction, crucial for resolving disputes.
Conclusion: The challenges posed by the current practices of GST enforcement are a significant deviation from the tax reform’s objectives. It is crucial for the integrity and success of the GST spectrum that enforcement practices be reformed to uphold fairness, transparency, and respect for the law. The economic health of the nation depends on a balanced approach that protects businesses from undue harassment and fosters a cooperative environment between tax authorities and the business community. Only through concerted efforts and strict adherence to legal standards can we ensure that GST fulfils its promise as a catalyst for economic growth and fairness.
Author Bio
pls share the information