Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ceat Ltd. Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 835 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ceat Ltd. Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court)

Patna High Court held that penalty is imposable under section 56(4)(b) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (Bihar VAT Act) on account of clerical mistake in mentioning of invoice number in SUVIDHA Form.

Facts-

The petitioner engaged in the manufacture and sale of tyres, tubes and flaps is concerned with a penalty order passed u/s. 60(4) (b) read with Section 56(4) (b) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 after detention of a truck carrying goods at the integrated check-post, Dhobi, Gaya.

Notably, the value and quantity got tailed with the invoice. However, invoice number was wrongly noticed as 002179; which was actually 002172.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031