This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Quashes Customs Act Penalty (Section 117) Due to Lack of Direct Connivance Evidence
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- P. Sinnamani Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
P. Sinnamani Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Introduction: The case of P. Sinnamani against the Commissioner of Customs, adjudicated by CESTAT Chennai, revolves around the imposition of a penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant, one of the co-noticees, faced the penalty in relation to a Show Cause Notice issued on 25.02.2020. The order-in-original, dated 30.06.2020, imposed a penalty of Rs.4,00,000 on P. Sinnamani.
Detailed Analysis: The impugned order imposed a common penalty against 12 co-noticees, including the present appellant, in response to a Show C...
