Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Top Forty Suspension (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Top Forty Suspension (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh) CESTAT Chandigarh held that penalty u/s. 112 not imposable as goods are not held liable for confiscation. Further, penalty cannot be imposed on EOUs for failure to achieve positive NFE. Facts- The appellants are a 100% EOU; they have imported certain capital goods availing benefit of Notification No.53/97 and domestically procured capital goods availing Notification No.1/95-CE dated 04.01.1995. Revenue alleged that the appellant has not fulfilled export obligation and therefore, is required to pay back the Cust...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930