Case Law Details
Case Name : Top Forty Suspension (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Top Forty Suspension (P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh)
CESTAT Chandigarh held that penalty u/s. 112 not imposable as goods are not held liable for confiscation. Further, penalty cannot be imposed on EOUs for failure to achieve positive NFE.
Facts- The appellants are a 100% EOU; they have imported certain capital goods availing benefit of Notification No.53/97 and domestically procured capital goods availing Notification No.1/95-CE dated 04.01.1995.
Revenue alleged that the appellant has not fulfilled export obligation and therefore, is required to pay back the Cust...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

