This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refunds Based on Legal Interpretations Should be Exempt from Recovery due to Subsequent Legal Changes
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Alkem Health Science Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Alkem Health Science Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)
Introduction: The Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Kolkata has recently delivered a crucial judgment in the case of Alkem Health Science versus the Commissioner of CGST & CX. This case revolved around the issue of refund claims concerning education cess and higher education cess paid by the appellant, a pharmaceutical manufacturer. The decision carries significant implications for similar cases involving the refund of these cess amounts.
Background: Alkem Health Science, engaged in pharmaceutic...
Author Info
Even though the judgement follows a precedent and is welcome being favourable to tax-payers, it raises a fundamental issue. In the same factual and legal situation there may be three scenarios 1. Refund is issued, 2. Refund is not released and 3. proceedings pending. The results would be different in the three situations without simply because different stage of refund while all the cases are similarly situated. This might be obnoxious and against equality before law. It needs clarification from the apex court.