Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Senor Metals Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 13954 of 2014-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Senor Metals Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) 

Introduction: In the case of Senor Metals Pvt Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad), the demand of customs duty was confirmed for manufacturing dutiable goods on job work basis without disclosing the verification report. The Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and various notifications, including 214/86-CE and 22/2003-CE, were invoked in the matter. The CESTAT Ahmedabad order directed re-adjudication, raising questions on principles of natural justice and violation of show cause notice.

Analysis: The case revolves around Senor Metals Pvt Limited, engaged in manufacturing brass articles, and its activities related to job work basis and dutiable goods. The Revenue argued that the appellant failed to comply with Rule 6(2) or 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and didn’t maintain separate accounts for inputs used in dutiable goods and exempted goods. A show cause notice was issued, demanding recovery of Rs. 2,29,73,314 under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, along with interest and penalty.

The learned Commissioner adjudicated the matter, dropping some demands but confirming others. The appellant challenged the scope of the show cause notice and the violation of principles of natural justice. The verification report, on which the demand was based, was not provided to the appellant, raising concerns over procedural fairness. CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the order-in-original and remanded the matter for de-novo adjudication.

Conclusion: The CESTAT Ahmedabad order highlights the complexities of duty demands and the significance of adhering to show cause notice and principles of natural justice. The case raises pertinent questions about compliance and procedural fairness in customs duty matters. The re-adjudication will be crucial in resolving the issues and providing clarity on the applicability of various notifications in the context of the appellant’s job work and dutiable goods activities.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031