This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bonafide Belief Shields Appellant from Extended Period invocation for Service Tax Liability
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Heena Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Heena Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
In the case of Heena Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, the issue of invoking the extended period for service tax liability comes into play. The appellant contends that the demand for service tax beyond the limitation period of one year is time-barred, as specified in Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994
The Show Cause Notices dated 21-4-2010 demand service tax for the period October 2004 to March 2009. However, it is crucial to establish whether there is evidence of suppress...
