Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Anand Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3844/Del/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bharat Anand Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

In a significant ruling in the case of Bharat Anand vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi clarified the legitimacy of deductions related to business promotion and tour & travel expenses incurred by a partner in a firm. The verdict addressed the issue of whether such expenses, incurred for professional duties as a partner, should be disallowed.

The appellant, Bharat Anand, is a partner in Khaitan & Co, LLP, and claimed substantial deductions for business promotion and tour & travel expenses. The tax authorities disallowed these expenses, arguing that as a partner, there was no obligation on Anand to incur such expenses, and that these should be borne by the entities themselves, namely, Khaitan & Co or KCO.

However, the ITAT held a different view. After reviewing the partnership deed and the professional commitments of Anand, the Tribunal observed that Anand is in whole-time practice as an advocate with Khaitan & Co. LLP and undertakes professional work for the firm. Consequently, any income he generates from professional work, even from associated entities like KCO, is considered a part of his professional income from the firm. Therefore, the expenses incurred on his total professional earnings are valid deductions.

The ITAT Delhi’s ruling in Bharat Anand vs ACIT case reiterates the validity of deductions for expenses incurred in the pursuit of professional duties. This judgment provides a crucial perspective on the tax treatment of business promotion and tour & travel expenses incurred by a professional partner, effectively clarifying that such expenses, when related to professional activities within a partnership structure, should not be disallowed. The verdict underscores the principle that expenses incurred for the advancement of professional activity are integral to the income generation process and are, thus, admissible as deductions under the tax laws.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031