Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hi-Lite Builders Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 620/Coch/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hi-Lite Builders Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin)

ITAT Cochin held that amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act made by the Finance Act 2020 is retrospective in nature. Accordingly, TDS deposited on or before the due date of filing return u/s 139(1) is allowable.

Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) assessing an income of Rs.1,03,48,780. Subsequently, the CIT, Kozhikode, set aside the order of assessment u/s. 263 with a direction to make fresh assessment on the ground that the tax deducted at source by the assessee during the period from 1.10.2008 to 28.2.2009 was credited to the Govt. account during May, 2009 to July, 2009 only and the AO did not make any disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia). The AO subsequently passed an order u/s. 143(3) read with section 263 disallowing a sum of Rs.7,49,20,296 u/s. 40(a)(ia).

Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. Accordingly, being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

Conclusion- The Hon’ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down the ratio that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) with respect allowability of the expenses on which tax is deducted incurred during the year that is remitted to Government account on or before the due date for filing the return of income u/s.139(1) being curative in nature is retrospective. In assessee’s case the tax deducted during the period from 1.10.2008 to 28.2.2009 was credited to the Govt. account during May, 2009 to July, 2009 i.e. before the due date for filing the return of income u/s.139(1). Therefore respectfully following the ratio laid down by the Apex Court, we hold that no disallowance is warranted in assessee’s case for the impugned amount and the disallowance made by the AO is deleted.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. T K WADHWA says:

    We are having GSTIN. We are doing business and our bankers transfer the excess amount in our current account to fixed deposit. We earn interest on this fixed deposit. TDS is also deducted. My query is whether Rule 42 of CGST is applicable. An early reply in this regard is highly solicited.

    Thanks in advance.

    TKW

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031