Case Law Details
Case Name : Crisil Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Crisil Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act unjustified when reimbursement of expenses is considered as receipts in total income and tax is paid on the same therefore no disallowance in terms of proviso to section 201.
Facts- In this case original assessment was made u/s.143(3) vide order dated 13/03/2015, wherein, the addition of Rs. 1,07,51,004/- was made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source for payments made to Crisil Ltd., which was in the nature of reimburse
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.