Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 10/SRT/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/10/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

Sec. 41(1) can’t be invoked for liability against purchase of defective machinery that was never put to use: Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ITO – [2023] (Surat-Trib.)

 Assessee was a private limited company. It was engaged in the business of Calcium Carbonate powder and trading of Calcium Bauxite. The assessee has filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring total income of Rs. Nil. During the scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted outstanding sundry creditors against machinery that was purchased in Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee was shown cause as to why the said amount should not be added to the total amount. The assessee contended that the machinery was defective and was never put to use. The assessee had not claimed depreciation on this machinery in any of the assessment years and the supplier was also instructed to take back the machinery. In absence of any claim of expenditure, the provision of section 41(1) cannot be applied. AO didn’t accept the assessee’s contention and made additions under section 41(1). On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the order of AO. Aggrieved assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal held that AO added the amount to the assessee’s income as per provisions of section 41(1) by holding that assessee had not demonstrated that liability was on account of capital expenditure. It was noted that lower authorities had not disputed the purchase of machinery and no adverse evidence was brought on record that liability was other than the purchase of machinery. It was also noted that machinery was not put to use and the assessee had never claimed depreciation thereon. Therefore, the amount shown by the assessee could not be taxed as a remission of liability under section 41(1).

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT SURAT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant in Practice from last 32 years. Any one who wants to discuss something related to Income Tax can mail me at rajeevjain_ca@yahoo.com or call on 9810581427. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Preparing for ITR Filing for Salaried Individuals: Key Precautions & Checks TDS on annual maintenance charges for maintenance of medical equipment No Section 69A addition where cash deposits reflected as sales & accepted by Revenue No assessment under section 153C in absence of incriminating material: SC Address to deliver Income Tax notice in case of person in judicial custody View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031