Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Udayanapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 7120 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/03/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Udayanapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)

The challenge in this writ petition is against the assessment order produced as Ext.P1 and the demand notice issued pursuant to the assessment. The assessment relates to the assessment year 2020­21. The only question that is involved is whether the petitioner’s Society is entitled to the benefit of Section 80P.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court contending that the said question has not been gone into by the assessing officer and that, it is a clear violation of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others v. Commissioner of Income Tax and another; 431 ITR 1. The petitioner has along with I.A. No.1 of 2023 produced the return filed by the petitioner wherein, a specific claim has been made for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The consideration of the assessment order is available in paragraph 3 of the order which says that it is evident from the name of the assessee that the assessee is a Co-operative Bank. Other than that, the question whether the petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society or a Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank has not been specifically gone into. The justification stated is that even though several notices were issued to the petitioner, they did not respond. This Court has in the judgment in W.A. No.753/2021 considered an assessment order in which the question had not been specifically answered and set aside the assessment order and directed reconsideration.

3. After hearing the counsel on either side, I am of the view that the petitioner ought to be given another chance to put forward their case before the assessing officer.

In the result, the writ petition is allowed. Exts.P1 and P2 are set aside. The 2nd respondent is directed to pass fresh assessment order with notice to the petitioner in accordance with law. The petitioner shall place before the authority the necessary documents which are required to show that they are entitled to come within the frame work of Section 80P.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031