Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Hari Prabhu Vs M. Thirumalai Thiyagarajan (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 40401 and 40402 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/01/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Raj Bros Shipping Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) on the customs broker alleging mis-declaration of goods is unsustainable as customs broker cannot be expected to have knowledge about the goods in the container as there is no dispute with regard to KYC document of the importer.

Facts-

BOE was filed by the customs broker M/s. Southern Clearing and Forwarding Agencies Pvt. Ltd. on behalf of importer M/s. A.K. Imports and Exports. SIIB officers examined the goods and found that the goods were grossly mis-declared and hence they were detained for further investigation. During the investigation, it came to the notice of the department that the container was removed from the Continental Warehousing Corporation (NS) Ltd. (Continental II CFS) by using forged documents.

Show Cause Notices were issued to various parties including the appellants herein for alleged illegal removal of the container using forged documents from the customs area.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031