Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) on customs broker unjustified once KYC of importer is undisputed

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shri Hari Prabhu Vs M. Thirumalai Thiyagarajan (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
M/s. Raj Bros Shipping Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) on the customs broker alleging mis-declaration of goods is unsustainable as customs broker cannot be expected to have knowledge about the goods in the container as there is no dispute with regard to KYC document of the importer. Facts- BOE was filed by the customs broker M/s. Southern Clearing and Forwarding Agencies Pvt. Ltd. on behalf of importer M/s. A.K. Imports and Exports. SIIB officers examined the goods and found that the goods were grossly mis-declared ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *