Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sailendra Narayan Panda Vs Pr. Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sailendra Narayan Panda Vs Pr. Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that as per new fiscal policy, possession of gold is not an offence. Accordingly, seized gold Balas are ornaments and directed to be released. Facts- The Appellant has filed some documents which would go to show that he is the legal heir of the Late Binod Bihari Panda. The 11 gold Balas of the Appellant are lying with the Department since 02.04.1976. The High Court by an order dated 16.07.1992 was pleased to set aside the confiscation order passed by the Adjudicating authority holding that the sai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930